Skip to content

Design review

Store function id: design-review. Price and full description: Design review in the store catalog.

One worker that reviews product and website material for clarity, ease of use, accessibility and visual quality, and returns findings by severity with a verdict. It may open pull requests with its revisions in a repository you allow.

  • The administrator subscribes, answers the install questions and allows the permissions.
  • Administrators and members give the workers tasks in Chat.
  • The box is enrolled with the store and the function is subscribed. See Store.
  • In Owner policy, allow the permissions marked “Tick it” or with a value below. Permissions with an install question are allowed by your answer. See Owner policy.
  • GitHub must be connected and list the repository to review.

Facts on this page come from the packages’ published definitions (checked on 8 October 2026). Your box shows the same facts before Install, under Permissions.

Package id faivr.agent.ivo-design-v2, version 1.0.0.

Reviews the product or website material you give it for clarity, ease of use, coherence, accessibility, trust, quality on all screen sizes and a visual style that is not generic. It returns findings ordered by severity, revisions you can act on, and a clear verdict.

Permissions in plain words

Permission Install question In Owner policy
Read files in its own workspace None Tick it
Create and change files in its own workspace None Tick it
Run commands inside its sandbox None Tick it
Reach the internet through the allowlist proxy None Tick it
Render web pages and take screenshots with the browser inside its sandbox None Tick it
Read one repository “Which repository should this worker review?” Allowed by your answer
Push its own branches and open pull requests on one repository, never merges (includes read) “In which repository may it open pull requests with its revisions?” (optional) Allowed by your answer
Read one product’s knowledge “Which product’s knowledge may it read for context?” (optional) Allowed by your answer
Read the workboard None Tick it
Change the workboard None Tick it
Run in one model lane: Standard None Run in one model lane: choose standard and press Allow

Install questions

  • “Which repository should this worker review?” Required. You choose a repository of your GitHub connection.
  • “In which repository may it open pull requests with its revisions?” Optional: Skip (the permission is declined) is offered. You choose a repository of your GitHub connection.
  • “Which product’s knowledge may it read for context?” Optional: Skip (the permission is declined) is offered. You choose a product of the box.

Default autonomy levels

Shown and changed under Administration, Packages, panel Autonomy levels. It has no protected actions, so it never asks for an approval unless you raise a level to “Asks you first”.

Kind of action Default level You can raise it to
Reads its own workspace Runs on its own cannot be raised (Fixed)
Writes files in its own workspace Runs on its own Tells you after, Waits for your check
Reaches the internet through the box’s list Runs on its own cannot be raised (Fixed)
Renders web pages in its sandbox Runs on its own cannot be raised (Fixed)
Reads repositories Runs on its own cannot be raised (Fixed)
Pushes its own branches and opens pull requests Tells you after Waits for your check
Reads company knowledge Runs on its own cannot be raised (Fixed)
Reads the workboard Runs on its own cannot be raised (Fixed)
Changes the workboard Tells you after Waits for your check, Asks you first, Always asks, with a reason
  • Work outside its own closed workspace on the box.
  • Reach hosts, repositories or products it was not given.
  • Merge on GitHub, push to the default branch, or create tags or releases.
  • Read a stored key or password.

Write these in Chat after choosing the worker. Change the details to your company.

  1. “Review the sign-up page in the review repository for clarity and accessibility, and give your verdict.”
  2. “Render our home page and list the five most serious design problems, most severe first.”
  3. “Propose the revisions for your top three findings as a pull request.”